Jump to content
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?

IanT

Members
  • Posts

    209
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by IanT

  1. 25 minutes ago, Downburst said:

    Is there anything to be said for all going out in the morning and buying the Daily Express for a good old article on Britain freezing in an arctic blast colder than Vladivostok boffins say. Ministers told to prepare cobra according to amateur weather boffin from Basingstoke?

    Lancaster, generally.

  2. 1 hour ago, Mike Poole said:

    Tableaux plot for the GEFS 12z, this is the value at each time point for the ensembles for the parameter, which is in this case, of course is wind gusts, gives an idea of the uncertainty, especially where I have indicated on Friday.  This is for somewhere close to London:

    B1001E55-1D3D-4A94-8F7F-52CBDD443811.thumb.jpeg.952b0413f13fd8370bdaef8ae592491f.jpeg

    Values are in km/hr.

    Some extraordinary values.

  3. 19 minutes ago, JamesC said:

    So implying that all of the models are wrong along with MO and other weather agencies (excl possibly some ICON runs)?

    I love your optimism! I personally think that this storm will hit and hit hard. 

    What is modelled is at the high end of historical experience, especially perhaps given the large area under threat. But there is more scope for downgrades than upgrades. It’s time to watch the runs, not yet time to “rush preparations to completion”…

  4. Interesting that the yellow warning for Friday is at the lowest point of the unlikely to very likely scale, but “high impact”. I think we see this very very rarely.

    The Met Office describe “high impact” resulting from wind using the following language:

    ”Widespread danger to life from flying debris.

    Widespread structural damage e.g. roofs blown off, mobile homes overturned, power lines brought down.

    Transport routes and travel services affected for a prolonged period.  Long travel delays. 

    Closure of main bridges, road and rail networks in many areas, and significant disruption to air and ferry transport.

    Widespread and prolonged disruption to power, and/or other utilities and services.

    Danger to life from large waves/beach material being thrown onto coastal route, sea fronts and coastal communities.”

    0723B3C4-5F01-4008-9FCD-D199490295D6.jpeg

    • Thanks 1
  5. 35 minutes ago, Ross90 said:

    Why are the models struggling so badly with this? At 7 or 10 days it's to be expected but at less than 3 days it could still go anywhere or not even exist... it seems like the further away the weather gets from the seasonal norm the more hopeless the models become.

    The characterisation that the models are “struggling” is inappropriate. Better to recognise that many different evolutions are possible from the current set of starting conditions, and that model output reflects this.

    • Like 6
  6. 24 minutes ago, pinball wizard said:

    And thats why it's just a yellow warning at present, POTENTIAL high impacts but currently MODERATE probability. As soon as the probability is firmed up then warnings will be updated as necessary. The met office have played it as they should, alerted folk to the potential and advised people to stay tuned to forecasts. If they feel the need to upgrade warnings they will. The last thing they will want is to go overboard now on something that may not happen and consequently undermine trust in the warning system.

    Luckily Neil Ferguson isn’t involved in NWP.

    • Like 4
  7. 16 hours ago, Don said:

    If that happens, winter will be a goner but great for those wanting an early spring (which isn't me!!)

     

    15 hours ago, IanT said:

    It’s only the second week of January. Surely a little early for “winter is over”, especially with some powerful features in play elsewhere on our side of the northern hemisphere..!?

     

    2 hours ago, Don said:

    Didn't say winter was over, but it wouldn't be good if the high pressure slips south as that type of pattern is difficult to break out of and by then it will be mid to late January.

    Errrr..... 

  8. 11 minutes ago, seb said:

    I really don’t understand this panic and talks of the bust of the century.

    ...

    Based on the drifts already happening on the Downs with some country lanes being close to impassable and those conditions bound to spread and worse, the warning is spot on.

     

    As always the emotionally charged posts are from people reacting to the gap between their hopes and reality. Not to any gap between forecasts and reality. 

    • Like 4
  9. Whenever we get close to the starting line, people always start to talk about downgrades. These posters are just making the mental adjustment from what they hoped for (something better than the best forecast of the last week for their postcode!) to what is actually forecast. Thus it is only a downgrade within their personal frame of reference, hence all the counter-posts saying that they don’t see a downgrade etc etc etc.

    First bottle of Making Tracks just finished. Thinking about a second. Maybe a Lynch-Moussas and some cheese straws...

    • Like 2
  10. 3 minutes ago, Mark wheeler said:

    I’ve been trying to work this out on all the maps . Epsom / Chessingon seems right on the edge but I can’t work it out completely.

    You can’t work it out at all to the level of precision you are seeking. The system/boundaries might easily be +/- 30 miles from where they are modelled right now. Counties - yes, counties plus N/E/S/W - yes, postcode areas - possibly, postcode districts & below = no chance. In truth it’s a radar/now-cast situation from this point.

  11. 3 minutes ago, icykev said:

    The period of interest for me now is +144 late next week. Low pressure looking to make inroads deepening as it approaches UKMO 144

    UW144-21.thumb.gif.98b3d99192ad6ff721cc2d5575b9fb59.gif

    GEM looking to bring in the low pressure system @156

    gem-0-156.thumb.png.1dd63f12a6d2fe000f8aef854e5dfb41.png

    Causes severe weather and snow as it stalls and disrupts against the cold. Any thoughts on it possibly becoming a named storm, as by this time it will have already become dangerously cold. Similar to storm Emma in Feb 2018.

    anim_jkd1.gif

    Resulting in thisgem-16-186.thumb.png.03cdd007edc0b8abc2a909982cec4a57.png

    Storm Emma 2018

    EUROPE_PRMSL_HGT500_2018_3_2_0.thumb.jpg.be12c528c4f166c841f44f2c7016e564.jpg

    Lets see what happens on the 12z✌❄

    It's hard to believe the low will remain as tight and organised as it is presently modelled. But it isn't impossible, so a named storm is a real possibility. Could be a three-way tussle for naming rights though. It might be interesting to look back at the starting conditions for Emma.

    I am 100% confident we'll get a "snow bomb" headline from the Daily Mail though...

    • Like 2
  12. 13 minutes ago, Ice Day said:

    An improved set of GEFS for my location - cold is in by 72 and more cold members at 192, showing a trend to extend the cold.

    image.thumb.png.981551721083c20f6ca45f1f7f46aee7.png

    And for our northern friends, these are for Manchester - even colder! 

    image.thumb.png.e4cfad788dea2574ff39b6c4dab86b56.png

    The for those in the north east - sweet baby Jesus 

    image.thumb.png.4befd54d76ade3852d7beac399f290ed.png

    Could you point me to the source of these please? I have been unable to find it through google etc.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...