Jump to content
Xmas
Local
Radar
Snow?
Message added by Paul,

This thread is for model related discussion only
Please head over to the Winter chat thread if your post isn't about the models. If you'd like localised weather chat, make sure you've joined your regional group. For purely emotional reactions to the models, the new model emotions thread is also available. 

Please use the insightful reaction on posts you think should be copied to the model highlights thread.

Please see the model discussion guidelines for more information about posting into this thread.

Recommended Posts

Posted
  • Location: Edmonton Alberta(via Chelmsford, Exeter & Calgary)
  • Weather Preferences: Sunshine and 15-25c
  • Location: Edmonton Alberta(via Chelmsford, Exeter & Calgary)
Posted

as a complete neutral (no feelings either way if its cold or not in the UK) IMO the only real problem here is the huge bias towards looking for cold and snow..hence many posters are blinded by that fact and don't give a balanced view of the models which in turn to leads to massive over expectation by others who may not understand what the whole output is showing and thus massive disappointment ensues and finger pointing starts when things don't turn out the way they wanted or expected. Its always been that way and unfortunately anyone who does give a fully balanced viewed will be swamped by hope casting in the winter months.

  • Like 7
  • Thanks 2
Posted
  • Location: Norway
  • Location: Norway
Posted (edited)

febr MJO event 

just to give an idea there is something soon going on..... also NAO is going neg. values 

image.thumb.png.d521d0a80d6c1d7dd8fb48babf4cac61.pngimage.thumb.png.0209d3076b914c82618ced383dbd68b6.png

Edited by Dennis
  • Like 5
Posted
  • Location: Raynes Park, London SW20
  • Location: Raynes Park, London SW20
Posted

Back to the models, the outer reaches of the ICON has the continuing theme of intense PV over Greenland and Euro high.  Are we going to break out of this pattern in time?  Time will tell.

image.thumb.png.4ec6963029259e9f5f30d135a4d3575d.png

 

Posted
  • Location: Hucknall, Nottinghamshire
  • Location: Hucknall, Nottinghamshire
Posted
1 hour ago, Catacol said:

"Background Zealots"? Hmm. Is this where we are at now, where those trying to unravel the complex task of forecasting get labelled as zealots? Either you know what that word means and are therefore genuinely trying to put the boot in, or you don't know what it means and perhaps shouldn't be using it.

I see in general the knives are out today. Disappointing. Let's have a go at a broad response:

1. There are 2 areas of ongoing research that interest those with a passion for this kind of stuff. First is the GSDM theory first put together about 15 years ago by Ed Berry. The second is a greater understanding of stratospheric impacts on our weather, another fledgling science that has also been around for 15-20 years approx.

2. One of the challenges of both approaches is to try and understand the inter relationship between the two. GSDM is largely anchored on developments in the Pacific alongside momentum impacts created by the big mountain ranges - Tibet and Rockies probably most importantly, Urals also. Strat modelling tries to interpret the impact of vertical wave propagation and how the column of air above the arctic is shaped/squeezed/stretched/split (or not) by these waves. Tropospheric patterns feed into the strat and vice versa - so they are definitely linked - but an understanding of the links is still in its infancy. When Amy Butler tweets that the reasons for the failed SSW in early January are not understood (given models tend to under rather than over model the likelihood of an SSW) then you know you are walking in a world of grey. And that failed SSW and what has transpired instead has had a huge hand to play in how January has developed.

3. From this, we have 2 options. Label these areas of research as a waste of time, as likely to produce accuracy as the advice of a cat (!!), or we engage with what is going on and try and unpick it. CC is not making this any easier because CC is making a mess of analogues - the atmosphere and the overall climate just isn't what it was in the 1960-90 period and adapting to the pace of change and how it impacts forecasting is a challenge.

4. Some of today's posters would clearly favour the former. Don't bother trying to unlock the door to understanding because it cannot be done. Fair enough - but not for me. I'm not a nihilist and wish to continue to try and learn. Perhaps those who see chaos theory as the only answer to our weather should have a thread all of their own, though the thread would probably make for pointless reading.

5. Finally - you might want to read posts more carefully. Only the other day I acknowledged in a post that the Xmas forecast was a bust, and that the recent cold was shorter lived than expected. Reasons for both were set out, bust was advertised. Two successes at the same time, early Dec and the snap just gone. And it looks as though next week will bust too. There you go - is that clear enough? If you want the reason laid out again, reflective strat event. Not forecast, not spotted even by those with proper qualifications in relevant climate science. But this winter is not done yet, and I still see distinct opportunity for further cold in February and again into March. 

 

As a concluding comment, we are dealing in probability forecasting. No one will ever get to the stage where we say "in 10 days' time it will snow in London and 6 inches will fall and stick." Nonsense. We look at probabilities. And when dealing in probability a 95% chance does not always land. I see some criticism of the MetO today as well. Really? Those of you happy to criticise forecasting methodology and happy also to criticise (possibly) the most advanced national Met Office in the world and its choice of language are seeking a level of absolute clarity that is unattainable.

If you have something to say that adds to the debate, say away. If your words are designed to tear, rip and demolish - silence is a better alternative.

 

People seem to forget too, for every "bust" and "damp squib" we get, we get more data on the reasons why the forecasts fall short. It can only get more accurate. The people analysing the data and getting it wrong are 1000x more useful to us all than people who (accurately) call a bust with no analysis.

 

Some people want to learn what makes the weather tick, and others just want to bet it all on The Atlantic because they think that's a safe bet.

  • Like 4
Posted
  • Location: Dorset
  • Weather Preferences: Warm and dry, or very cold. See my profile for model trivia
  • Location: Dorset
Posted
12 minutes ago, Northern Sky said:

I think it's fair to say that we did see some of these hugely respected posters drop references to iconic past Winters in relation to the signals that presented at the time. For some, all the caveats are dismissed and this could only mean a definite ticket to a Winter wonderland - and inevitably all the despondency that comes with anything less than that. 

Were those knowledgeable posters wrong to do that given that every word is scrutinised by everyone else? Personally I don't think so - where would be the fun in a dour presentation only in the most certain of outcomes?

I think you've nailed it there

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
  • Location: Netherlands
  • Location: Netherlands
Posted
Just now, Duane S. said:

 

Cold spells cannot appear without potential but potenital does not mean it will occur

 

I think expection management is here the key. For the one who reads the comments and the one who writes them. If one writes about potential, I think it is important to write about the things that can go wrong. For the reader, I guess it is matter to understand this text of Duane S above and realise it is not settled science but developing knowledge. WIP. Work in progress.  

  • Like 5
Posted
  • Location: Stroud, Gloucestershire
  • Weather Preferences: Snow, Thunderstorms, Heat, Ice, Freezing Fog. Etc
  • Location: Stroud, Gloucestershire
Posted
4 minutes ago, MATTWOLVES 3 said:

Next year I'm returning to the old school when I was 8...getting a picture of the UK from an old atlas,cutting some cardboard weather symbols and drawing my own isobars...yeh it's old fashioned but it seemed to work a treat..Try it folks it definitely eases the stress of it all 😉

Sound like weather magic! Please start now if it works. 

  • Like 3
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...