Jump to content
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?

Buzzit

Members
  • Posts

    778
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Buzzit

  1. GFS 12z is a nightmare !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    for mild sunny weather lovers

     

    Actually I am reminded of the arbitrariness of many things in life, with London set to hit around 30c every day for the next week+ with high overnight temps.. should the met office just call it an official heat wave anyway because surely those susceptible to high temperatures will be (if not already) suffering

     

    I spare a thought for them

  2. It's a lovely quiet, hot afternoon, here, 28.4 degrees c on a shaded north facing balcony! Can anyone explain something we saw around 8pm last night. The sun was veiled by some cloud, though we could see the disk of the sun through it. Some distance to the left of the sun but at the same height was a bit of a rainbow, a small arc but turned 90 degrees sideways so it looked vertical. Neither hubby nor I have seen anything like it before and were wondering what caused it. Anybody got an explanation, please?

    CD

    Well i think you are leaving yourself wide open to a slew of jokes Posted Image (lucky this is a weather forum)

     

    post-10554-0-87309200-1373902333_thumb.j

  3. For what it is worth I posted in the summer thread on May 7th that we would have above average temperatures and below average rainfall for summer with no Northern blocking and my worry was (and still is) that we would not have see a change to a traditional autumnal pattern at the correct time (hence drought conditions) The rational behind my prediction was analogues for Europe based on where we were at the start of May as well as the conditions experienced during the preceding Southern Hemisphere summer - but with a particular focus on statistical anomalies vs traditional patterns.

     

    Not extremely scientific but it is the best I can do :)

  4. LOL when I clicked post and read it again I though who will reply first with such a comment, anyway by which I did mean the heat and the health of some family members, we have cleared 26.4oC here now.

    Your BBQ is taking a while to warm up if its only at 26.4c :) needs to be hotter to make sure you kill all the bugs to ensure health safety when you serve the food to the family :)
  5. I believe this summer will have above average temperatures and below average precipitation. All in all an excellent summer but not sure if it will reach 2003 levels... (my mother re-married on the hottest day of the year in 2003 - needless to say a lot of beverages needed to be consumed Posted Image) My biggest concern is that we may not revert to a traditional autumnal pattern this year. No entrenched northern blocking this summer. (no I am not Ken Ring)

    Not doing too bad so far :)

    • Like 1
  6. A piece of research, any piece of research, is perfectly valid, within the parameters stated, so long as it's carried out according tp protocol...what hacks, politicians and vested interests spin it as, however, is not...Which is why we have this divide...

     

    As Jesus said (I'm not religious, I don't know a better quote) 'beware of false prophets' - or should I have said 'profits'?

    Not sure why you keep bringing money into the discussion :) I have little time for phrases such as "thoroughly vindicated" and I have little time for Corporate fat-cats, Career Politicians, and Monopolistic Corporations in general. What i would like to see is a move away from arguing about what the temperature / how much sea ice and what the quality of it was xxxx years ago vs today. And more of an effort made to encourage the government to spend money on science & technology to help us get through the situation we find ourselves in (both climatical and as a society) with more than 1M people left at the end of it.

     

    No posts appear to swing anyone to either side which is why I think we have three threads so people can live in their niche :)

  7. Hockey sticks?

     

    Few if any American climate scientists have been as falsely accused — and thoroughly vindicated — over both their academic practices and scientific results as Dr. Michael Mann.

     

     

    http://www.desmogblog.com/national-science-foundation-vindicates-michael-mann

    Whatever - lets move on from the hockey stick - and thoroughly vindicated is the sort of exageration politicians use to tell you how great and right and just they are. Nothing worse in my opinion when it comes to the debate when you point to a link rather than the source so people can actually read what the judgement was (which contains great use of carefully chosen statistics of course which both sides do, which further illustrates what a pain in the backside it is to argue with each other)

  8. and Steve was not much more accurate statistics showed than the poster I made comment on.His views about model bias on certain runs does have some correctness about it but his writing off re the 06z last winter was OTT to be honest.Some justification for, whatever the cause, his comments about the European area being a bit different to the northern hemisphere.Our memories play tricks with us, we are all guilty, if that is the right word, of this. Hence my preference for 'real' data or statistics that show the reality

    Having looked at the stats the 6z has performed very well amongst the GFS op runs when considering the last 30 days in total, but its recent form (last 7 days) is much less impressive in comparison. Without having the time to prove anything, my theory is that as it does have less initialisation data, it has a chance to get things right if other runs with more initialisation data make more of a certain feature than may be warranted (ie: it performed well with respect to the initialisation of high pressure over the UK) and, in any case, as we do not 100% understand all of the drivers of our weather, it always has the chance of being more correct at times. It is why I look at the 6z and 18z for confirmation of trend rather than specifics, especially as we cannot compare them to UKMO and ECMF at these times.

  9. Heights getting a bit further west on GFS 18z vs 12z, and the trend is in disagreement with ECM, that's all I'm saying.

     

    Oh look the -10 850s reform over Greenland at 372 lol Posted Image

     

    Posted Image

    Good spotting ! At least it is later than yesterdays 6z Posted Image (I will keep saying bonkers while the 6z continues to throw up bonkers chart output). Someone tell me it is a trend go on lol

    post-10554-0-56626600-1373454713_thumb.p

  10. Whilst i take on board what was said a little up the thread I still feel that the 'divide' is not healed but made wider by allowing uncorrected gibberish , from both sides?, to remain unchallenged within threads?

     

    Were it the model thread then 'corrections aplenty' would appear and our many 'novices' ( certainly me among them) learn by those addendum's? to think that folk will happily go off to google every 'snippet' is , for me, a big step away from the day to day reality I recognise?

     

    Simple corrections of 'factual' information do not only 'stick' in a persons mind ( due to the 'correction' highlighting the 'error'?) but also help educate the original poster ( who may have actually sought to deceive and is shown the folly of that action?)?

     

    Sounds to me like you should take some time and create your own climate forum... Then you can run it as you like while also posting on Netweather. By the way - do you believe in the Hopi lower and higher path and the Blue Star prophecy ? or is it unrelated to your passion on climate ?

  11. I am always reminded of how as you go through schooling - scientific ideas are presented to you as facts - the same facts which you later find out were either only a very small part of a much larger process, or simplified so much as to be almost redundant - I always think of photosynthesis as a good example. This experience for me has always shaped my thinking on science, that we only ever know what we think we know, but we will probably never know what it is that we truly need to know.

     

    The media also has a lot to answer for on many topics of public interest (not just scientific) the move from the late 90s to tabloid journalism and little critical thinking or 'investigative' journalism in almost all mainstream media productions has led to a complete lack of reliability / trust being able to be placed on the news media, while they continue to allow almost anyone to say whatever they want and they never question them on the accuracy of their statements.

     

    At some point in the future I am going to hear a politician say "Let's be clear" just one too many times

×
×
  • Create New...