Jump to content
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?

Yarmy

Members
  • Posts

    5,224
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Posts posted by Yarmy

  1. 47 minutes ago, Broadmayne blizzard said:

    I don't know Knocker but the GFS has found a way on the last two runs.

     

    It's possible of course. Here's the classic (and somewhat overused) example from Dec 62.

    archivesnh-1962-12-21-0-0.png

    A rampant tpv lobe over Greenland and what would appear to be endless cyclogenesis from NE North America.

    48 Hours later:

    archivesnh-1962-12-23-0-0.png

    (Crucially there was no pesky Norwegian shortwave to scupper things, but there we are).

    For the avoidance of doubt, I think it's extremely unlikely that anything like this will pan out. HP over the UK and Europe looks likely in the medium range with its progression northwards determining whether that's mild and dry or cold and dry.

    • Like 6
    • Thanks 3
  2. 20 minutes ago, johnholmes said:

    That chart cannot have the low in the correct position; why?

    It has deepened a lot, if that is correct then it must turn NE!

    The laws of physics and meteorology cannot be ignored, well not in my view

    Well yes, and that's exactly what it does. The cyclogenesis starts here:

    gfs-0-108.png?6

    ...and then it tracks NE through the UK. Of course, it's too far out to determine exact details of the track, position, and depth of a storm, so it's extremely unlikely to pan out like that. But I'm not seeing anything particularly unphysical aside from the GFS tendency to deepen  depressions too much.

    • Like 2
  3. People keep going on about the Atlantic blasting through, but the single defining characteristic of recent GFS op runs in the outer reaches (i.e Day 10 onwards) is the precise opposite of that. I think people just immediately think +NAO = zonal, stormy and wet. Instead (just as a single frame example), we have this as a typical synoptic:
    gfsnh-0-384.png

    That's a very positive NAO and AO, but it is very dry and (for the most part) bone-chillingly cold at the surface across thousands of miles of continental Europe and Asia.

    • Like 8
  4. 2 minutes ago, TSNWK said:

    I recall a post on this yesterday and mogreps not buying the Easterly.. but confess I got drawn in by several GFS runs.. even after 12 years on the models I never learn. 

    Ha, confirmation bias, isn't it. Had the ECM been showing Scandi heights while the GFS wasn't, nobody would've given the latter the time of day. 

    Anyway, carpe diem. Absolutely beautiful out there this morning, walking the dog at 7am.

    • Like 4
  5. 1 minute ago, cheeky_monkey said:

    here is the point...if we have the ability to detect planets around distant stars.. why cant we find a Neptune sized planet in our solar system??..its not like its a set of car keys

    Because you detect planets around other stars by tiny variations in the brightness of the light being emitted by the star. The frequency and magnitude allow you estimate the orbit and mass (I'm over simplifying here). In the Kuiper belt there is nothing emitting any light in any portion of the electromagnetic spectrum.

    • Like 2
  6. 1 minute ago, Love Snow said:

    Very surprised at the lack of news coverage regarding this if this storm was bartering the south later it would be all the talk on the news outlets sadly people won’t be prepared. 

    Was just thinking that. A lot of people are going to get caught out by this.

  7. Well there are 3 different things here, which have somehow become connected in your head.

    1. Planet X (or Nibiru) was a bonkers conspiracy theory about a planet that would sweep through the solar system in the early 21st Century causing a pole shift and the destruction of life as we know it. Originally, it was meant to happen in 2003, then 2012, then...

    2. Planet 9 is a mooted Neptune-sized body way (waaaay) out in the outer solar system. It was proposed in a paper in 2015, but has yet to be detected and there is some scepticism over its existence. See here:

    file-20200415-153302-1fpfbot.jpg?ixlib=r
    THECONVERSATION.COM

    In the search for the hypothetical Planet Nine, scientists may have uncovered another explanation for the patterns in the orbits of Kuiper Belt objects.

     

    3. Neil Ferguson. What this has to do with any of the above is beyond me? It's absolute nonsense anyway (of course).

    As a general note, I'll leave a quote from Carl Sagan which you might ponder.

    "For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring."

     

    • Like 1
  8. 1 hour ago, Weather-history said:

    Right on the coast

    Gwrych_Castle%E2%80%99s_east_front.jpg

    Hopefully, they'll bin the whole thing so I don't have to sit and watch it every night with the family. For some reason they enjoy watching people they've never heard of eat animal genitalia.

    • Like 6
×
×
  • Create New...