Jump to content
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?

goosey007

Members
  • Posts

    486
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by goosey007

  1. 3 hours ago, andymusic said:

    GFS 6z more of the same - cold winds from the east start everything off next weekend - then around 2nd March 2023 the snow starts coming - then an ARTIC blast like December 2010 - 100 YEAR EVENT - not likely - every 13 years now lol

    GFSOPEU06_384_25.png

    Thanks for the updates Andy ......shame its all a bit out in FI..... especially ref snow detail ........ Encouraging non the less let see what occurs! also ref dec 2010 the fact this will be late winter/early spring suggests it wont be as potent for most....

    • Thanks 1
  2. Just now, NewEra21 said:

    If the other models begin to take steps towards the GFS, you just know the GFS will lose all interest in any cold spell now 😂

    that would be somewhat logical giving the vast differences in the modelling we are currently seeing ..........but they must all look V similar a T72 SURELY ! another thing on my mind this GFS upgrade must be good at modelling at least some scenarios other models struggle with maybe this it that scenario! just rubbish at 80% of others  

    • Like 2
  3. 3 minutes ago, Nick2373 said:

     

    How’s it straw clutching? This is the model discussion isn’t it? It was the GFS that picked up last Julys heatwave. And yes it’s been updated since but again what evidence do you have it’s 100% wrong?

    I would say all the other models not supporting it and the fact its performed like this recently on its own  i.e mid dec 2022.......its not 100% evidence its wrong this time of course but its enough for me to be more than sceptical of its recent output! .....i would love for it to be correct but recent history for type of cold here not in its favour either

     

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 2
  4. 1 minute ago, nick sussex said:

    The ECM 06 hrs control run highlights why you don’t want a solution that tries to combine the Euros and the GFS.

    You either want the low southern Greenland to become quickly absorbed as it heads ne and ejecting shortwave energy cleanly se or you want that low to run east se and a decent gap to the upstream troughing .

    wheres your money Nick ?

×
×
  • Create New...