Jump to content
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?

-uksnow-

Members
  • Posts

    548
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by -uksnow-

  1. 2 minutes ago, Nick L said:

    Ah it's that time of year to say this until I'm blue in the face...Those "EC snow charts" are in no way representative of what the EC is actually showing. Temps and dew points both above freezing on that timeframe, it would be a load of cold rain. Whoever came up with the algorithm for those charts was clearly hunting for clicks, they were atrocious last winter.

    Perhaps for the UK, yes, but to be fair they were extremely accurate for snow predictions here in Oslo.

    • Like 3
    • Thanks 1
  2. 2 minutes ago, tight isobar said:

    Whats extraordinary..

    Is the normal canadian lump-load vortex' is our needle in the ar#e..

    But given momentum and perfect placements!!..

    Could be the ace card...-very unusual-..

    And downwell/assortment are miraculously in euro plots/favour..

    And the draw could be of out of usual thought fruition!!!

    Lets see he's conclude though.

    He-s held in high regard for he's dynamical decipher!!!!

    All very very interesting!!!

    Anyone got google translate?

    By day 14 of todays 12z EPS were seeing signs of a Scandinavian block appearing, certainly a better picture than yesterdays day 15 - Hopefully its picking up on some amplitude which *hopefully* will gather pace in coming runs.

    • Like 1
  3. 1 minute ago, Danny* said:

    Probably accurate, the South-East misses out again. 

    On a serious note, I don't know what algorithms those charts use to determine snow accumulation but they definitely seem well "out there" compared to every other model in existence.

    Not strictly UK related, but over the past month of snow here in Oslo they have performed to within an inch every time. 

    ECM 168 seems to be pulling something else out the bag tonight, signs of our Scandi friend appearing.

    • Like 3
  4. 2 minutes ago, radiohead said:

    12Z GFS at T150 is a little less amplified than the 06Z, which in turn was a little less amplified than the 0Z. Not at trend we want to see as we get closer to the reliable timeframe.

     

    But let's see what the rest of the run brings...

    Yes less amplifie but by 168 the heights are cut off around Greenland as opposed to shunted and sinking east like the 6z, so an upgrade in my opinion.

    gfsnh-0-168_urh2.png

  5. Just now, Daniel Smith said:

    The negative tilt of the high and the shortwaves coming out of America smell undercut to me.

    I think the next few runs will show the high moving Northwards into Greenland as the shortwaves slide underneath the block - Unless of course we see a GFS classic overblowing the lows.

    To be honest I think we've overcome the first hurdle now, but the look of 3 lows spinning around eachother in the Atlantic al la GFS seems unlikely to me, it never handles that kind of energy well. UKMO seems the better option keeping them split slightly. Think the trend so far is our friend, but i expect post 120hr improvements on successive GFS runs when it gets a handle on the atlantic lows..

    • Like 1
  6. 6 minutes ago, bluearmy said:

    Pretty good NH agreement between ec and gfs ops at day 9

    Yep, and a freaky-large ridge over the near continent forming, the trend is our friend here especially for developments later into November. Though since my move to Oslo I might not be waiting quite so long..

     

    gfsnh-0-276.png

    • Like 2
  7. As wonderful as it is seeing precipitation charts for next weekend and the prospect of a few snow showers or even a trough, a quick reminder of what was showing for today, this time last week should be noted, to what is actually verifying. Take a look, given the fantastic inputs from the more knowledgable on here of the background signals, we stand our best shot at something to salvage this tease of a winter within the next few weeks... I look forward to comparing next Mondays output to what is currently progged by the models :)

     

     

     

    Screen Shot 2017-02-06 at 22.28.52.png

     

    Screen Shot 2017-02-06 at 22.33.31.png

    • Like 2
  8. Forgive me if I'm wrong, but could our problems with the ECM actually start as early as T72/96hrs, with the placement of the 'supporting' low in the mid atlantic. 

     

     

    Comparing the big three, ECM has the deepest and furtherest west of the lot, thus backing up what @Singularity proposed earlier about the 'over amplification' of the ECM, deeper low in a more S/SW position = more phasing with energy of the low running up greenland, and less so with the descending scandinavian low pressure - just a thought.

     

     

    Screen Shot 2016-12-26 at 22.10.33.png

    Screen Shot 2016-12-26 at 22.10.44.png

    Screen Shot 2016-12-26 at 22.10.26.png

    • Like 3
×
×
  • Create New...