Jump to content
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?

jvenge

Members
  • Posts

    1,641
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by jvenge

  1. 4 minutes ago, NeilN said:

    I'm always dubious of TV weather broadcasts, but where is this mild weather come from? Is this official or just them using some dodgy model? 

    I know living down here in the South West we're out the running, but there's got to be a good chance the Midlands has a shot. 

    It depends which model runs and which models are looked at. As an example....

    But the mild air is not outlandish for your general area, as you can see.

     

    ecmwf-deterministic-EGGD-daily_tmin_tmax-0044800.png

    gfs-deterministic-EGGD-daily_tmin_tmax-0044800.png

    gfs-deterministic-EGGD-daily_tmin_tmax-0066400.png

    gfs-deterministic-EGGD-daily_tmin_tmax-0088000 (1).png

  2. 2 minutes ago, Seasonal Trim said:

    Some people need a day or two cool off in the other thread.

    Where are all the decent posters from days gone by?

    I know the Model thread has always been a bit trying during Winter in the past, but it seems hyper annoying this year!

    Most are still there, but they get drowned out. I suggest you make use of the ignore list, as it is much easier to read the thread. I personally like to read what BlueArmy and CreweCold have to say, because although they want a certain outcome, they don't overstate the chances of it.

    • Like 1
  3. 1 minute ago, Liam Burge said:

    Do you guys think the models still have time to allow for the colder air to spread to the south-west quicker? 

    For what time period? I think if there is snow to be had it is most likely to come  late evening on the 25th until the 27th. It's not just looking at precipitation but also what looks to be rain and snow and then trying to figure out even if you get falling snow if it will settle. Just to add though, the GFS Op is amongst the most optimistic snow potential model runs on display. In reality I don't think the model means are too far apart for that festive period.

    • Like 1
  4. Just now, Polar Maritime said:

    The delay before a transfer of data begins following an instruction for its transfer.

    Thats the best I can do via Google.

    Almost, but the latency applies to the transfer as well, not just the delay in beginning transmission, as is usually based upon the quality of connection between the points and also physical distance. That's the networking term anyway. 

    I think the person who came up with that gem is probably trying to say that the data was already out of date as it was rolling out and therefore you shouldn't believe the run. Yes, even for netweather in winter that's a very creative one.

    • Like 2
  5. 4 minutes ago, sheikhy said:

    Just goes to show though even though its mogreps the fact that it changes every run just shows that its not as good as its made out to be!!!

    Isn't that the general idea of mogreps? Runs so often and updates the metoffice forecast many times per day? Metoffice forecasts seem to update every two hours and they do indeed change, so I assume that changing output can only be from mogreps, unless someone else knows of something else they use?

    But anyway, surely it is a good thing they run so often and can change based on what they see.

    • Thanks 1
  6. 2 minutes ago, SussexSnowman said:

    A mild wet Christmas Day it is.   whilst it was a faint glimmer of something special for the big day, it wouldn't be typically British to not answer the door when the cold comes knocking. If other parts of the UK get some white stuff, enjoy. Still hurts missing out on it back in Feb. The fine margins are unreal. All one can do is hope elements smile down on us for once.  

    Mild for my location too  but I suppose there is some interest for the UK from boxing day onwards, but after that people seem to be looking at different time periods, precipitation levels, rain, snow, etc, and trying to big up a consensus that seems to be very wonky and not as good as stated. 

    • Like 1
  7. Just now, Captain Shortwave said:

    Stranger things have happened this year

    There are still solutions that provide snow for the Midland for example. However it is complicated and is isn’t just the placement of the boundary between the cold and mild air. Other facts such as weak surface highs will great effect how intense the precipitation is and how quickly it will fizzle away.

    Not to mention the difference between quite a lot of rain vs snow. 

    • Like 2
  8. Just now, Bald Eagle said:

    Well..thats me had enough of reading my computer programme is better than your computer programme. Someone even put they are exhausted ( makes me wonder how we won two world wars) Enjoy your Christmas everyone

    Oh I dunno, it is some what of a guilty pleasure. People complimenting the GFS this morning when they were completely trashing it last week. The mental gymnastics at play is quite extraordinary. In small doses it is quite funny, but it kinda does ruin the thread.

    • Like 4
  9. 33 minutes ago, shunthebartlett92 said:

    I mean, that was written just before the new output this morning, I could see a better update this afternoon if things stay as they are! Let’s see what Marco and Matt say, and see if Met4Cast feels a bit more optimistic this morning

    I ignore most people posting in the thread but sometimes (well okay, all the time) its better to just look at the outputs yourself. GFS this morning shows a snow event beginning the very early hours of boxing day. 

    But it has very poor support on the ensembles. I'll let the model whisperers guess the rest.

    gfs-deterministic-europe_wide-total_snow_10to1_cm-0617200.png

    gfs-ensemble-all-avg-europe_wide-total_snow_10to1_cm-0617200.png

×
×
  • Create New...