Jump to content
Thunder?
Local
Radar
Hot?
IGNORED

Storm Eunice - 18th February


Recommended Posts

Posted
  • Location: Swansea (Abertawe) , South Wales, 420ft ASL
  • Weather Preferences: Storms & Snow.
  • Location: Swansea (Abertawe) , South Wales, 420ft ASL
Just now, kev238 said:

I’m assuming there might be further red warnings to come in next hour or so

Yeah or late tonight. And I agree most of that warning is out at sea

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: on a canal , probably near Northampton...
  • Weather Preferences: extremes n snow
  • Location: on a canal , probably near Northampton...

It's that kink in the pressure lines where it is doing it, as the NW winds are forced down and bite into the prevailing SW ones.

20220217_105904.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Norman, Oklahoma (University of Reading in the UK)
  • Weather Preferences: SNOW! And a good thunderstorm
  • Location: Norman, Oklahoma (University of Reading in the UK)

Glad there's finally a red warning out, although I expect it'll grow this afternoon. Worth remembering that the current amber warning is already at the highest severity, only slightly down on confidence so the reasoning for a red upgrade would NOT be due to models showing stronger winds, but due to an increase in confidence. From this, I would expect a red to be issued this afternoon/evening if the sting jet feature is still present in the 12Z's. I would think it would stretch from APPROXIMATELY Kidderminster through Milton Keynes to Ipswich. The met are looking for confidence now not strength. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Liphook
  • Location: Liphook
7 minutes ago, Skullzrulerz said:

What others areas did you think that the red warning would be issued?

I think its the only area where we can have really high confidence and where the winds are severe enough to justify it...at the moment.

We do have the risk of any sting jet coming through but there isn't huge agreement on that feature yet and so it remains a medium probability but high risk situation, a toughie for sure because if it doesn't develop the background winds in the region probably don't quite warrant a red atm on their own.

For example it is on the ARPEGE suite of models, but not even a hint of it on the UKV. ICON does develop it...over the north sea.

So you can see why they've not gone red just yet, too much of a chance it doesn't happen as currently predicted. They will want to see more data and agreement before pulling that trigger this early.

 

Edited by kold weather
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Isle of Canvey, Thames Estuary
  • Location: Isle of Canvey, Thames Estuary
9 minutes ago, Nick L said:

Simply inadequate red warning from the Met Office.

Perhaps they are thinking of a higher colour? Burgundy!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Aldridge, West Midlands (180M)
  • Weather Preferences: Snow, Snow, Snow and Cold
  • Location: Aldridge, West Midlands (180M)

BREAK: Cabinet Office Minister Michael Ellis to chair COBR this morning to discuss response to Storm Dudley and Storm Eunice

 

Edited by Midlander
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Eight miles north of Dartmoor 155m ASL
  • Location: Eight miles north of Dartmoor 155m ASL
3 minutes ago, smichling said:

Glad there's finally a red warning out, although I expect it'll grow this afternoon. Worth remembering that the current amber warning is already at the highest severity, only slightly down on confidence so the reasoning for a red upgrade would NOT be due to models showing stronger winds, but due to an increase in confidence. From this, I would expect a red to be issued this afternoon/evening if the sting jet feature is still present in the 12Z's. I would think it would stretch from APPROXIMATELY Kidderminster through Milton Keynes to Ipswich. The met are looking for confidence now not strength. 

Hmmm…. Right through here then….

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Wellingborough, Northamptonshire
  • Location: Wellingborough, Northamptonshire
12 minutes ago, Man With Beard said:

AROME 06Z ... still showing a 100mph streak from the Midlands east. 90-95mph all the way to the E Anglia coast. Will this really verify? It's in the 1987 category for any areas affected, if it does.

image.thumb.png.ba95bd5ed64128a0d180726bebb5954c.png

this is close to or over my location and it’s quite scary, i have an hour walk to work between 12-1pm tomorrow, will i be able to even make it?

we had brief 70mph gusts for several minutes in a localised “tornado” in late october and that was manic here.. not sure I want to experience anything stronger or more prolonged then that!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: The Deben Valley, Suffolk
  • Weather Preferences: Snow, Thunderstorms, very cold (inc. anticyclonic) weather
  • Location: The Deben Valley, Suffolk
14 minutes ago, Jake Lamparski said:

Warning updated, no red

Yes there is, for North Cornwall and South Wales, where risk is greatest. Further Red will only follow when/if there's more certainty regarding an sting jet feature etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Near King's Lynn 13.68m ASL
  • Weather Preferences: Hoar Frost, Snow, Misty Autumn mornings
  • Location: Near King's Lynn 13.68m ASL
1 minute ago, Nick L said:

Are the Met Office seriously arguing that 90mph gusts in relatively sparsely populated coastal parts of Cornwall is significantly less disruptive than 80+mph gusts through London? Utterly baffling warnings.

It really is bizarre. This should be all over the headlines, but - as it stands - people are going to take no notice of an amber warning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Isle of Canvey, Thames Estuary
  • Location: Isle of Canvey, Thames Estuary
3 minutes ago, Nick L said:

Are the Met Office seriously arguing that 90mph gusts in relatively sparsely populated coastal parts of Cornwall is significantly less disruptive than 80+mph gusts through London? Utterly baffling warnings.

Agree, all that technology, and like VAR and some people don’t know how to use it properly!

Edited by GSP
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Cheddington, Buckinghamshire
  • Weather Preferences: Winter: Cold & Snowy, Summer: Just not hot
  • Location: Cheddington, Buckinghamshire
Just now, Yarmy said:

It really is bizarre. This should be all over the headlines, but - as it stands - people are going to take no notice of an amber warning.

I remember last winter they issued an amber warning for 3cm of snow in East Anglia. So they are currently implying that that "event" is on a par with tomorrow.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Eight miles north of Dartmoor 155m ASL
  • Location: Eight miles north of Dartmoor 155m ASL
2 minutes ago, Nick L said:

Are the Met Office seriously arguing that 90mph gusts in relatively sparsely populated coastal parts of Cornwall is significantly less disruptive than 80+mph gusts through London? Utterly baffling warnings.

My sister was living in the City when the 87 hurricane occurred. It had been a hot day and someone had left one of the windows in the NatWest tower open and all night she watched boxes of computer paper(remember them?!) unloading into the night sky!

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Beccles, Suffolk.
  • Weather Preferences: Thunder, snow, heat, sunshine...
  • Location: Beccles, Suffolk.
12 minutes ago, kev238 said:

I’m assuming there might be further red warnings to come in next hour or so

I think so, aye. Mostly amber for now, but going to red as confidence-levels increase. Not so much 'inadequate' as too early?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Bridgend, S Wales
  • Location: Bridgend, S Wales

I'd imagine the met are doing it hour by hour. So, about 24 hours notice for the SW (peak storm 10 ish) and within the next few hours, do the same for the areas affected at 12 ish onwards. Not ideal but I can't see that they won't do a red warning.

 

Just now, Mark Smithy said:

The current Red includes significant areas of population by the way, Bristol and Cardiff among them.

This is very nasty.

162340268_Screenshot2022-02-17at11_11_36.thumb.png.79131fbe200fa3e5a6739d1a404782f0.png

It also includes significant high tides that mirror the peak of the winds

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The ensemble spread for inland areas in the south is currently ~65-80 mph. Red warnings are reserved for events that are all but certain. When 65mph (which would not warrant a red) is still within the realm of uncertainty, it's pretty understandable they haven't bumped it up IMO.  The amber warning is as high as it can go on severity. I guess they just need to see what inland gust values the models converge to later today.

Edited by Sainsbo
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Leicestershire (hinckley)
  • Location: Leicestershire (hinckley)
5 minutes ago, Nick L said:

Are the Met Office seriously arguing that 90mph gusts in relatively sparsely populated coastal parts of Cornwall is significantly less disruptive than 80+mph gusts through London? Utterly baffling warnings.

Agree entirely, The BBC were ramping up the dangers at least. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Norman, Oklahoma (University of Reading in the UK)
  • Weather Preferences: SNOW! And a good thunderstorm
  • Location: Norman, Oklahoma (University of Reading in the UK)
5 minutes ago, Wingman Blue said:

Hmmm…. Right through here then….

Don’t take my very vague forecast as gospel though! in all seriousness use the met office not what I or someone says here, however much we might want to be a pro forecaster we aren’t! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: London
  • Location: London

With regards to the media, it doesn't help when tabloids follow forecasts from Sybil Trelawney and lead with headlines about 1500 mile snow fronts.

In other words, as ever, the media are partly to blame for crying wolf.

Then when a proper forecasting organisation (The Met Office) tells people to stay indoors everyone is by then weary.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...