Jump to content
Thunder?
Local
Radar
Hot?
IGNORED

Model Output Discussion - Into Winter


Message added by Paul,

This thread is for model related chat and discussion. Please head over to the Winter chat thread if your post isn't about the models. If you'd like some localised weather chat, make sure you've joined your regional group

Please use the insightful reaction on posts you think should be copied to the model highlights thread.

As ever, please keep to the community guidelines, the guiding principles of which are:
Be kind -- Stay on topic -- Share your knowledge -- Be polite -- Be honest -- Be tolerant -- Be family-friendly
 

Recommended Posts

Posted
  • Location: Redhill, Surrey
  • Weather Preferences: Southerly tracking LPs, heavy snow. Also 25c and calm
  • Location: Redhill, Surrey

Interesting subtle change to the LP by ESB

 

image.thumb.png.bdc8ca7758e877085225795318725318.png
 

image.thumb.png.ea9f4976c7b6eecc965c92d5ea23064b.png

12 z has it much further South and less likely to loop over the AZH?

 

BFTP

Edited by BLAST FROM THE PAST
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Penwortham nr Preston, Lancashire
  • Weather Preferences: Severe frosts, warm sunny summers,
  • Location: Penwortham nr Preston, Lancashire
26 minutes ago, TSNWK said:

I actually think it's got more potential...less energy spilling out from Greenland..Atlantic heights ridging up a smidge better?

See what you are saying TSNWK, there are lower heights over greenland on the 06z to the 12z. But 😟, there is more energy flowing beneath Greenland on the 12z which may go on to flatten everything out with little fuss

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: frome somerset 105m ABSL,
  • Weather Preferences: cold snow, thunderstorms
  • Location: frome somerset 105m ABSL,
Just now, BLAST FROM THE PAST said:

Interesting subtle change to the LP by ESB

 

image.thumb.png.bdc8ca7758e877085225795318725318.png

Has it gone missing again?? I noticed this a little while ago, @Catacol I think bought this as well. One run it’s there and the next it not. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Orpington Kent.
  • Location: Orpington Kent.
1 minute ago, BLAST FROM THE PAST said:

Interesting subtle change to the LP by ESB

 

image.thumb.png.bdc8ca7758e877085225795318725318.png

looks much flatter in our neck of the woods at day 7 - however take the point on the ESB LP being different.. and not connected to Vortex will it make a difference by day 10

image.thumb.png.b7a70ded43c29b6185c1fafac88c6623.pngimage.thumb.png.8c3837a058555d70035f965d430c8a27.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: st albans
  • Location: st albans
Just now, Battleground Snow said:

Descending trough is back on the menu for Xmas eve on the gem

gemnh-0-198.png

As noted above, the system off the esb doesn’t connect to the trough and this allows the Newfoundland ridge to extend towards the Azores ridge 

gfs will have to decide if the prominent euro ridge it has can be shifted east by the trough 

  • Like 1
  • Insightful 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Evesham/ Tewkesbury
  • Weather Preferences: Enjoy the weather, you can't take it with you 😎
  • Location: Evesham/ Tewkesbury
5 hours ago, That ECM said:

Hi Matt, maybe a daft question but hey ho, in your opinion do lows-highs drive the jet stream or the other way round? TIA

The Jet stream helps create Lows and Highs….😊

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Reigate Hill
  • Weather Preferences: Anything
  • Location: Reigate Hill

Another variation on a theme from the GFS 12z, with a similar outcome for around Christmas of a bride spell of colder uppers. 06z and 12z:

gfseu-0-216.thumb.png.cf928dc1983b40f5be9e65c15435a71c.pnggfseu-0-210(1).thumb.png.6e0ae2e15ce819458ded5de23b96a607.png

Christmas eve on the 12z:

image.thumb.png.7be560396a0038bbf1ede920a9c4d433.png

 

Edited by IDO
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Hull
  • Weather Preferences: Cold Snowy Winters, Hot Thundery Summers
  • Location: Hull
9 minutes ago, bluearmy said:

could the 12z’s become interesting ???

image.thumb.png.018237e6ce144fdd130e17d7d085f77e.png

It's trying to do something a bit different.... but verification is another question. Nice chart for Christmas eve though.

The little mid-Atlantic high and weaker heights to our SW are a positive for sure but are we being lead up the garden path again?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Surrey
  • Weather Preferences: Mild, sunny winters/stormy, snowy winters and warm, dry summers
  • Location: Surrey

Maybe JMA was right after all

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Hull
  • Weather Preferences: Cold Snowy Winters, Hot Thundery Summers
  • Location: Hull
Just now, Kasim Awan said:

That's just a modified Bartlett.

I hope that is tongue in cheek as it is a hugely modified Bartlett 🤣

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Crewe, Cheshire
  • Weather Preferences: Snow, storms and other extremes
  • Location: Crewe, Cheshire
Just now, January Snowstorm said:

Lol, it's game on again!!

Deep cold Christmas Eve

image.thumb.png.f795706e715e8837393ee39a11af10c2.png

The game was never off.

There is nothing that supports entrenched Euro heights. That’s why I was at pains to tell people to be wary of any modelling of them for persistent periods of time.

  • Like 6
  • Insightful 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Ireland - East Coast
  • Location: Ireland - East Coast
1 hour ago, Catacol said:

From publicly available sources:

ECMWF budget for 2022/23 = £54.7m (member states) + £43.7m (Externals) + £12.9m (Data sales). Total = £111.3m  

WWW.ECMWF.INT

An overview of who we are can be found in the Who we are section. Below, we offer a breakdown of some of the essential facts relating to our work (as of August 2023).

Bureau of Meterology (Australia) budget for 2022/23 = $345.5m (Govt funding) + $98.8m (Source income). Total = $443.3 Aus.

 

WWW.TRANSPARENCY.GOV.AU

Transparency portal

 

Now - this doesn't quite tell the whole story because ECMWF is purely focusing on computer modelling while the BOM is an agency with a much broader remit. There is nothing in public data to ascertain what % of their $443.3m is spent on modelling as opposed to other projects they undertake, but still it is a misrepresentation to claim that BOM is a small scale local operation compared to the giant that is ECMWF.

And to deny the relevance of location is to deny the human condition. We are all more concerned with what is at our back door. BOM runs their MJO forecast twice daily. ECM once daily. Evidence, should you need it.

Finally - the evidence on accuracy was carefully laid out in a previous post. I don't think anyone said BOM "will be more accurate" - instead the evidence shows that BOM comes second to ECM. In modelling the recent MJO phase 4 - 5 transition BOM outperformed ECM in forecasts provided at the end of November. 

 

 

 

The ECMWF pools from 35 member countries that have their own funding and met organisations and budgets, do we add those up, including the UK, France and Germany etc, in addition to the funding ringfenced for ECMWF. I poorly expressed it perhaps.  To compare the budgets doesn't consider the function of course and I have no idea of BOM other than the recent amplification. With regards to the MJO I'll stick to  the ECMWF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...