MattStoke
Members-
Posts
6,236 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
15
Content Type
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Events
Learn About Weather and Meteorology
Community guides
Everything posted by MattStoke
-
The bias in there really irritates me, and people completely deny that it exists and that anyone pointing it out is themselves being biased. Eugh. Much prefer frontal snow, personally. Higher risk but you don't need deeply cold air and the snowfall is often more substantial and widespread, but some seem to think it automatically makes a return to raging south westerly and so would rather stay dry and hope for small, more marginal and more localised features to pop up, which simply isn't true. Seen fronts bring snow and leave the UK in cold air numerous times. Always a bit disappointed when fronts trend away from the UK in these setups.
-
I'm sure many in here will agree this is the best outcome for 'all' because it brings snow to the south east Common conception is that frontal snow is bad because it always means a return to mild weather, which simply isn't true. Plus, frontal snow doesn't need as cold an airmass as convective snow. Just things that frustrate me in this forum. It would though be surprising if there weren't other smaller features popping up in such an unstable and messy looking flow. They're just always likely to be more localised and often but not always smaller amount of snow than from a front.
-
Model Output Discussion - Into 2024
MattStoke replied to Catacol's topic in Forecast Model Discussion
It shows 24 hours of continuous snowfall for quite a large area. May be overdone and may well not play out like that but it doesn’t mean that GFS run is terrible just because this forum is full of southern bias. -
Model Output Discussion - Into 2024
MattStoke replied to Catacol's topic in Forecast Model Discussion
-
Model Output Discussion - Into 2024
MattStoke replied to Catacol's topic in Forecast Model Discussion
-
Model Output Discussion - Into 2024
MattStoke replied to Catacol's topic in Forecast Model Discussion
It's also often though not always the case that these lows end up further south than initially modelled, so if anything those in the south would almost want lows to be modelled fairly far north this far out. -
Model Output Discussion - Into 2024
MattStoke replied to Catacol's topic in Forecast Model Discussion
Model highlights thread shows only the most informative posts based on reactions. -
Model Output Discussion - Into 2024
MattStoke replied to Catacol's topic in Forecast Model Discussion
GFS similar but a little further north so naturally the consensus in here is that it's terrible. -
Model Output Discussion - Into 2024
MattStoke replied to Catacol's topic in Forecast Model Discussion
Bemusing at times in here. GFS 6z looks better to me than the 0z. Just not as good as other models. Yet the latter gets labelled as 'terrible' where the former didn't. -
Model Output Discussion - Into 2024
MattStoke replied to Catacol's topic in Forecast Model Discussion
Spot on. -
Model Output Discussion - Into 2024
MattStoke replied to Catacol's topic in Forecast Model Discussion
Can’t believe the cold air has yet again been pushed back from the 15th to the 15th: