Jump to content
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?
IGNORED

Winter Model Output Discussion 01/02/2013 12z onwards


Coast

Recommended Posts

Posted
  • Location: HIgh Wycombe, Bucks Approx 200m ASl
  • Weather Preferences: Snow, snow and more snow
  • Location: HIgh Wycombe, Bucks Approx 200m ASl

Well the fact you are back to mr positive them Mr prozac is the best forecast I need.

Kx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Weston Super Mare , North Somerset
  • Location: Weston Super Mare , North Somerset

Oh my god , there is going to be some head scratching at the Met offfice before they issue tomorrows guidance , I don't think anybody expected that from the ECM . just amazing charts .. This all starts at t+48 as there is enough height's in Greenland to start the NE Wedge process ... If ECM does change (which i'm starting to believe it wont) then it will have to be in the next 48 hours ..

ECM1-48.GIF?03-0

Edited by snowmadchrisuk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: HILL OF TARA IRELAND
  • Weather Preferences: SNOW ICE
  • Location: HILL OF TARA IRELAND

Unbelievable at 168, stunning and rock solid from the ECM something has to give soon?

Untill all the big 3 ukmo gfs ecm are in agreement most of us in here will wait and see!

Edited by snowice
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Morden, Surrey.
  • Location: Morden, Surrey.

Had to take a break over the past week for health reasons but am glad i am now back to join you all in the quest for cold part two.

Going by what i have cached up on it seems as if we have another stand off and again i am inclined to put my faith in the ECM over the GFS which in my world is what i call a ' Catch up ' model. In other words & especially when cold weather comes into play it's a model that slowly falls back into line run by run day by day & imo rarely gets the correct pattern beyond d5+. I mention it struggles with cold weather patterns esp those coming from a e-ne component & i say this because nearly all cold spells that has happened from that source has been noted to have one thing in common WESTWARD CORRECTION.

Slowly Slowly ect the ECM will be proved right i feel & the GFS will come crawling inline eventually.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Stroud, Gloucestershire
  • Weather Preferences: Extreme!
  • Location: Stroud, Gloucestershire

This is a stunning 168 from ECM, large high retrogressing (or ridging) west, channel Low, cold pool just to the east. Brilliant stuff.

Wetter version,

Recm1681.gif

Edited by chris55
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Currently Southminster, Essex (but original home town Northampton)
  • Weather Preferences: Heavy snow/Blizzards in Winter, Cool Summers. (I'm allergic to heat)!
  • Location: Currently Southminster, Essex (but original home town Northampton)

ecm will drop the solution tonight i feel

gfs and ukmo want ger there .there is to much energy in the jet

Do you still have the same feeling now??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hat off Steve your right, it looked like an eastward correction to me at first glance. I have to say I'm starting to come round. Can't believe the ECM has stuck to its guns on so many runs now! I will either love or hate the ECM in a few days time. Is there a middle ground between the GFS and ECM? I'm struggling to see what it would look like?

There is a middle ground that *COULD* spoil the show & thats the low at 144 - 168 makles strong corrections East & slides more SE towards the North sea.- As opposed to the UK

So as it stands large room for eastward corrections to still be safe - large room for westward corrections from the GFS-

S

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Nr Chelmsford, Essex
  • Weather Preferences: Hurricanes, Thunderstorms and blizzards please!
  • Location: Nr Chelmsford, Essex

Fill in the missing letters, B _ _ M. Not you Steve!!!!

ECM1-192.GIF?03-0

Oh, and the uppers are rather interesting as well

ECM0-192.GIF?03-0

Edited by Ice Day
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Morden, Surrey.
  • Location: Morden, Surrey.

we will have North Westerlies by the time we get to +0

What makes you so certain?

If its the GFS your banking on then that's your opinion however cards on the table the GFS is well known for westward correction when our winter weather comes from a e-ne component.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Linslade, Beds
  • Weather Preferences: Deep cold
  • Location: Linslade, Beds

The next gfs run will leave us none the wiser, however I expect a less impressive cold solution from ECM tomorrow which will begin the climb down with that model. This watering down should then continue on subsequent runs.

Did someone call a taxi for Lord Stratus rofl.gif

post-9329-0-41104100-1359917384_thumb.jp

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: SE Kent
  • Location: SE Kent

ECM is great but not worthy of booms I have to say. Plenty there to spoil the evolution. As others have said, we need more of the 51 to support the Op along with other models for me to sit up and take notice...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Catchgate, Durham,705ft asl
  • Location: Catchgate, Durham,705ft asl

ECM has the pattern a touch further east at day 6 compared to yesterday but is still fine

and showing good consistency,especially at that range.good.gif

today.. yesterday..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Stroud, Gloucestershire
  • Weather Preferences: Extreme!
  • Location: Stroud, Gloucestershire

192, cold and unstable. No super cold uppers but plenty cold enough for snow.

Recm1921.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: portsmouth uk
  • Weather Preferences: extremes
  • Location: portsmouth uk

i think even if the ecm backed of abit it still would be fairly cold its very incredible but seeing these charts tonight could be just a dream in two days time as steve said there is apossibility of a spoiler.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Peterborough N.Cambridgeshire
  • Location: Peterborough N.Cambridgeshire

I would really like the 12Z to come off. Whilst I may miss the snow at +168 I would be pleased for members in the W/SW because this would be a classic snow event that potentially causes isolated locations to be cut off. At +192 I would see my snow via convection. I don't even need to see the rest of the run because I know the cold E,ly flow would continue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: North Lowestoft
  • Location: North Lowestoft

Could one of the more experienced weather model watchers explain to me why when a particular model is consistent in showing cold, and possibly snowy conditions arriving for the UK, that models consistency receives great applause from the masses, but when another model shows a consistent less cold outcome it appears to be laughed out of town?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Nr Chelmsford, Essex
  • Weather Preferences: Hurricanes, Thunderstorms and blizzards please!
  • Location: Nr Chelmsford, Essex

But it's 7 days away. This needs to be shown +72

Feet firmly on ground. No "booming" from me

Good for you! Just commenting on the 192, it is the model discussion thread after all!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...