Jump to content
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?
IGNORED

Model Output Discussion 1st January 2014-06z onwards.


phil nw.

Recommended Posts

Posted
  • Location: Orpington Kent.
  • Location: Orpington Kent.

Because a trough can undercut it if we can lower heights over Europe allowing it to ridge SW, from there  all sort of possibilities would open up and just because there is no slider on this single run doesn't mean that is what will verify. Unfortunately the same applies to the behaviour of the Arctic high.

Chicken and egg me thinks, we can't get a trough heading southeast because of the heights to our south and we need lower heights to our southeast so that a trough can drop in...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Manchester
  • Weather Preferences: Sunny and warm in the Summer, cold and snowy in the winter, simples!
  • Location: Manchester

GFS loses the plot in FI.....a mish mash of synoptic garbage.....says it all and perhaps suggests a pattern change isn't far away

 

Posted Image

 

Describes it perfectly Crew.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Essex, Southend-On-Sea
  • Weather Preferences: Warm, bright summers and Cold, snowy winters
  • Location: Essex, Southend-On-Sea

Posted Image

 

Hmm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Sheffield South Yorkshire 160M Powering the Sheffield Shield
  • Weather Preferences: Any Extreme
  • Location: Sheffield South Yorkshire 160M Powering the Sheffield Shield

A much better GFS already for cold fans... Arctic High force down Northerly winds...

 

 

Well actually South Westerly still. But it does show a deep FI weakening of the Atlantic. I found the ukmo T144 FI chart interesting although I'm sure about the transition from T120. Of course there's the normal deep FI cold plunge from the GFS to keep posters happy.

post-2404-0-82444200-1388680980_thumb.gi

Edited by The PIT
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Essex, Southend-On-Sea
  • Weather Preferences: Warm, bright summers and Cold, snowy winters
  • Location: Essex, Southend-On-Sea

V Cold FI.

 

Posted Image

 

Posted Image

 

If skies were clear it would feel raw.

Edited by SN0WM4N
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Crewe, Cheshire
  • Weather Preferences: Snow, storms and other extremes
  • Location: Crewe, Cheshire

 so you can understand the phrase "Do not post off topic rubbish in this thread"

 

That's a bold statement there AJ....

 

 

*Runs for cover*

 

 

After a clueless GFS this evening, let's see whether the ECM can shed some light on the days 7 through 10. GEFS will be interesting tonight to see whether a cluster do get a NE'ly flow to us towards day 9-10.

Edited by CreweCold
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Manhattan, USA
  • Location: Manhattan, USA

I'm not buying this run after seeing it all, it's all very too strange and over-done. Would be great if it came off, and would tie into MetOffice long ranger, but the differences of 6 hours is ridiculous.

 

From:

 

Posted Image

 

To This:

 

Posted Image

 

 

From this:

 

Posted Image

 

To This:

 

Posted Image

 

Posted Image

 

Something not right unless the GFS has picked up on something...

Edited by Glenn W
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Manchester
  • Weather Preferences: Sunny and warm in the Summer, cold and snowy in the winter, simples!
  • Location: Manchester

Chicken and egg me thinks, we can't get a trough heading southeast because of the heights to our south and we need lower heights to our southeast so that a trough can drop in...

 

You are assuming GFS is correct at 168 onwards.

If we get a cut off high to our North and slider pressure will drop to the South as the trough undercuts/slides. Everything is chicken and egg in MO to a certain degree because the air masses interact with each other, the skill is trying to decide what weight to give each competing element or at least explaining what these elements are and how they might develop.

Otherwise It is a case of wait and see how things develop. Yes high pressure to the South could be a spoiler and that has not been ignored in previous analysis of the slider scenario but the flat GFS is nowhere near set in stone and frankly there is not much support for it.

 

Here is UKMO 12z at 144h

 

Posted Image

 

As explained previous;y cut off heights have migrated toward Greenland with the Atlantic ridge joining up, also the Arctic high is nosing SW. Pressure is lower tot he South and the trough West of Greenland is disrupting.

I am repeating myself here though.

Edited by Mucka
  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Orpington Kent.
  • Location: Orpington Kent.

I'm not buying this run after seeing it all, it's all very too strange and over-done. Would be great if it came off, and would tie into MetOffice long ranger, but the differences of 6 hours is ridiculous.

 

From:

 

Posted Image

 

To This:

 

Posted Image

 

I

 

From this:

 

Posted Image

 

To This:

 

Posted Image

 

Posted Image

 

Something not right unless the GFS has picked up on something...

It looks wrong because the charts are from two different runs, the Milder ones are from the 06z, the colder are from the 12z Oppps ;)
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Crewe, Cheshire
  • Weather Preferences: Snow, storms and other extremes
  • Location: Crewe, Cheshire

I'm not buying this run after seeing it all, it's all very too strange and over-done. Would be great if it came off, and would tie into MetOffice long ranger, but the differences of 6 hours is ridiculous.

 

From:

 

Posted Image

 

To This:

 

Posted Image

 

 

From this:

 

Posted Image

 

To This:

 

Posted Image

 

Posted Image

 

Something not right unless the GFS has picked up on something...

 

As I said, it appears though a new signal is being picked up on......and I doubt it's any form/offshoot of the zonal weather we've been experiencing..... *wink*

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Penwortham nr Preston, Lancashire
  • Weather Preferences: Severe frosts, warm sunny summers,
  • Location: Penwortham nr Preston, Lancashire

Have to love the way GFS throws the Azores at us the moment we lower pressure to the South.

Just going to say the same thing lol!, good to see the back of the euro high all the same. Opens up different ideas :)
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Cheddington, Buckinghamshire
  • Weather Preferences: Winter: Cold & Snowy, Summer: Just not hot
  • Location: Cheddington, Buckinghamshire

It looks wrong because the charts are from two different runs, the Milder ones are from the 06z, the colder are from the 12z Oppps Posted Image

 

That was the point of the post, pointing out the wild swings from run to run.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: ILCHESTER
  • Location: ILCHESTER

http://www.meteociel.fr/ukmo/runs/2014010212/UN144-21.GIF?02-17

 

 

pretty good UKMO tonight !!

 

GFS party pooper as usual

 

s

Any idea what the latest verif stats at T+144hrs are Steve, or anyone? From memory wasn't UKMO one of the worst at that range recently?

Edited by shedhead
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Manchester
  • Weather Preferences: Sunny and warm in the Summer, cold and snowy in the winter, simples!
  • Location: Manchester

GEM close but no cigar. 

 

Posted ImagePosted Image

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Orpington Kent.
  • Location: Orpington Kent.

That was the point of the post, pointing out the wild swings from run to run.

That was the point of the post, pointing out the wild swings from run to run.

Really. Well not very clearly then. Mentioned differences of 6 hours, not between runs and lets be frank we would need a dedicated topic if we highlighted everytime the differences between runs of gfs 384 charts. Shall we leave it like that. Edited by TSNWK
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Dulwich Hill, Sydney, Australia
  • Weather Preferences: Hot and dry or cold and snowy, but please not mild and rainy!
  • Location: Dulwich Hill, Sydney, Australia

Any idea what the latest verif stats at T+144hrs are Steve, or anyone? From memory wasn't UKMO one of the worst at that range recently?

2nd best after the ECM, according to here

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Sheffield South Yorkshire 160M Powering the Sheffield Shield
  • Weather Preferences: Any Extreme
  • Location: Sheffield South Yorkshire 160M Powering the Sheffield Shield

Any idea what the latest verif stats at T+144hrs are Steve, or anyone? From memory wasn't UKMO one of the worst at that range recently?

Here you go. http://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/gmb/STATS/html/new_acz6.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Crewe, Cheshire
  • Weather Preferences: Snow, storms and other extremes
  • Location: Crewe, Cheshire

GEM close but no cigar. 

 

Posted ImagePosted Image

 

Fine margins of error there.....the sort of margin of error the GEM may have come day 7 or 8??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Peterborough
  • Weather Preferences: Snow and frost in the winter. Hot and sunny, thunderstorms in the summer.
  • Location: Peterborough

UKMO and GEM want to take the ECMs route of a wedge of heights north of the UK, whether this can deliver cold to the UK is the next question.

Give the GFS a couple more attempts, it's not that far off the others with that wedge, just pushes the lot over Scandi before trying to disrupt.

Expect, joy, pain, misery, excitement from the model output as the jet gets corrected north and south, bring snow potential to some and leaving others wet. Probably should get some prozac ready Posted Image

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...