Jump to content
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?
IGNORED

Model output discussion - The run up to Christmas


Met4Cast

Recommended Posts

Posted
  • Location: Rotherham, East Dene
  • Location: Rotherham, East Dene
4 minutes ago, LRD said:

Sure, yeah you're right. It wasn't necessarily a comment on whether that will produce snow or not for us (snowking's superb post should put that to bed). It was more a general observation on what must be a very unusual situation for Europe for the time of year

Oh and you've set off the 1963 KLAXON\!!! 

Oh I know mate yeah. It is very unusual to have these synoptics and not have the -10 850 somewhere near the UK. 

Im finding it fascinating and i cant wait to see what this translates on the ground. Big debate on snow or no snow. Im in the snow camp like snowking and the met but we will see and all learn along the way 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Maldon, Essex
  • Location: Maldon, Essex
6 minutes ago, Spah1 said:

If we failed to get a decent snowy spell from this I’d quit weather watching. C38A2064-2977-4ADF-B2FB-CBAAF4C5BBE8.thumb.png.d3c037798f336578fd1877654dfb5caa.png

This is the UK - famed for finding any route other than to cold, regardless of how promising the synoptics are!

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mike Poole said:

You’d be waiting a long time, it doesn’t exist any more!  

Strange that, it's verification stats haven't changed much 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Straiton 145m asl
  • Location: Straiton 145m asl
1 hour ago, topo said:

UKMO is closer to ICON..

I wouldn't trust GFS at this stage..

Why wouldn’t you trust GFS because it’s not showing what you want to see or have you got a scientific reason to back your comment?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Penicuikblizzard said:

Why wouldn’t you trust GFS because it’s not showing what you want to see or have you got a scientific reason to back your comment?

Would take a brave soul to completely distrust the GFS at the moment given it was the first call this cold spell, IIRC?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Beccles, Suffolk.
  • Weather Preferences: Thunder, snow, heat, sunshine...
  • Location: Beccles, Suffolk.

At least it'll be mild!

h500slp.png    h850t850eu.png

I do hope those T850s are warm enough for a barbie!:drunk-emoji:

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Manchester Deansgate.
  • Weather Preferences: Heavy disruptive snowfall.
  • Location: Manchester Deansgate.
1 minute ago, Skullzrulerz said:

What does this mean? 

Its a proper split very high up in the Atmosphere of the polar vortex, its right at the top of the stratosphere, about 150000ft, it needs to get much further down which we may see on subsequent runs, i would just in the next few runs be happy to see that run repeated, it may also be a lot easier for it to have an impact in the troposphere as well, as the trop seems like its wanting exactly that pattern, just not quite getting right up to Greenland on most runs yet, if that propagates down it may just give the assistance needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Gillingham, Kent
  • Weather Preferences: Snow, Thunderstorms,
  • Location: Gillingham, Kent
17 minutes ago, Skullzrulerz said:

What does this mean? 

R.I.P Vortex. Hello winter.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: st albans
  • Location: st albans
8 minutes ago, iowpompeylee said:

That’s a beauty, i always feel if we have the Ukmo on board we are 75% there! I always feel the other models are stocking fillers! But that’s my opinion! 

i don't like the ukmo run - system is too deep and circular. coldies want it stretched out a bit and col like over the uk. gfs is better imo. i know all about low slp and low heights etc etc but the depth of that system really mixes out the 850's on approach so that we would take some time to redevelop a cold pool

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Shanklin, isle of wight
  • Weather Preferences: Snow,snow and more snow
  • Location: Shanklin, isle of wight
3 minutes ago, bluearmy said:

i don't like the ukmo run - system is too deep and circular. coldies want it stretched out a bit and col like over the uk. gfs is better imo. i know all about low slp and low heights etc etc but the depth of that system really mixes out the 850's on approach so that we would take some time to redevelop a cold pool

Let’s hope the two marry up and bring the right conclusions! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: South Essex
  • Location: South Essex
5 minutes ago, bluearmy said:

i don't like the ukmo run - system is too deep and circular. coldies want it stretched out a bit and col like over the uk. gfs is better imo. i know all about low slp and low heights etc etc but the depth of that system really mixes out the 850's on approach so that we would take some time to redevelop a cold pool

I'm not sure I'm buying the fact that come the day this low will be quite so deep. It just seems a bit OTT to me. In fairness its not just METO but its been across most of the output. Just get the sense that it might not be such a deep feature come the day and am always a bit wary when charts look a bit clean. Surely this would be a breeding ground for all sorts of secondary systems (AKA the famous 'shortwave). 

Less deep would be good for cold prospects.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Gillingham, Kent
  • Weather Preferences: Snow, Thunderstorms,
  • Location: Gillingham, Kent

There is a little support on the GEFS for the high to ridge towards the Griceland area as per the GFS 12z Det run & indeed the past couple of runs, too.

YES.thumb.png.308656a9f8ce0c956b08a2fec7d3bc45.png

Though we were here a few weeks ago too with the GFS progging height rises in this region which never became reality, seems it could be a *thing* in this version of the GFS. Would like to see a lot more support for this trend in the next few runs and indeed on the EPS suites. The GFS does tend to be quite poor at times after all..

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Rotherham, East Dene
  • Location: Rotherham, East Dene
6 minutes ago, Met4Cast said:

There is a little support on the GEFS for the high to ridge towards the Griceland area as per the GFS 12z Det run & indeed the past couple of runs, too.

YES.thumb.png.308656a9f8ce0c956b08a2fec7d3bc45.png

Though we were here a few weeks ago too with the GFS progging height rises in this region which never became reality, seems it could be a *thing* in this version of the GFS. Would like to see a lot more support for this trend in the next few runs and indeed on the EPS suites. The GFS does tend to be quite poor at times after all..

Good to see. I think this is the next logical move

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: South Essex
  • Location: South Essex
Just now, Zak M said:

P12 is just..

-16c uppers in East Anglia/Kent from a northerly!

gens-12-1-300.thumb.png.3882f136f919c02d8cc6ac91bfad2617.png   gens-12-0-312.thumb.png.3c4841a44c5953973ddaa350a422c152.png

Despite this, there will still probably be one member that will say' tHE uPPeRs aREn'T cOLd eNOuGh'

Not me. Follow the isobars back to the source on that chart and the difference in uppers becomes easy to explain. A true arctic airmass rather than air sourced from a long way south (even if it has looped around a massive area of low pressure).

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: porth (Welsh valleys)
  • Weather Preferences: Cold and very cold.
  • Location: porth (Welsh valleys)
5 minutes ago, Sweatyman said:

just on twitter Glosea says yes to SSW

Let's just hope it benefits us though!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...