Jump to content
Thunder?
Local
Radar
Hot?
IGNORED

Model Output Discussion - Into 2024


Catacol
Message added by Paul,

This thread is for model related chat and discussion only.
Please head over to the Winter chat thread if your post isn't about the models. If you'd like localised weather chat, make sure you've joined your regional group. Or if you just want to moan about the weather or models, or would like to ramp up whatever may be on the way - there is now a dedicated ramp and moans thread.

Please use the insightful reaction on posts you think should be copied to the model highlights thread.

As ever, please keep to the community guidelines, the guiding principles of which are:
Be kind -- Stay on topic -- Share your knowledge -- Be polite -- Be honest -- Be tolerant -- Be family-friendly

Recommended Posts

Posted
  • Location: Orpington Kent.
  • Location: Orpington Kent.
1 minute ago, Lukesluckybunch said:

Good gfs run impressive uppers..!

Yep.. about 2 lower across the uk day 4. Nothing in on heights going north at day 5.. now to look out for low pressure from south west around day 8… needs to back off..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: South Essex
  • Location: South Essex

Well, I think were now pretty nailed on for the initial easterly. Cold but very dry. Pressure is simply too high for any convection and the trend over last 24 hours has been for the heights to increase.

So, its now all about what happens next 🤔

 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Darlington
  • Weather Preferences: heavy convective snow showers, blizzards, 30C sunshine
  • Location: Darlington
35 minutes ago, Ali1977 said:

WOW, I mean this is only 168 - follow that UKMO/GFS 

IMG_2367.png

That is an awesome chart maybe a day away from greatness. Thank god that pesky shortwave has done one. The whole run is better due to that buggering off. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: uxbridge middlesex(- also Bampton oxfordshire
  • Weather Preferences: blizzard conditions. ice days
  • Location: uxbridge middlesex(- also Bampton oxfordshire
Just now, Jason M said:

Well, I think were now pretty nailed on for the initial easterly. Cold but very dry. Pressure is simply too high for any convection and the trend over last 24 hours has been for the heights to increase.

So, its now all about what happens next 🤔

 

Run 🏃‍♂️ with the vents at closer range- it’s ALWAYS optimal- for convection, within close proximity @ 24/ 48 hrs out.. this has legs…trust me 🤘

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Nr Chelmsford, Essex
  • Weather Preferences: Hurricanes, Thunderstorms and blizzards please!
  • Location: Nr Chelmsford, Essex

UKMO and GFS at 144

image.thumb.png.126b186d6b823e34418ebb7c2b3ee339.png image.png

Both look great at this point

Edited by Ice Day
  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: North East Cotswolds, 232m, 761feet ASL
  • Location: North East Cotswolds, 232m, 761feet ASL
Just now, northwestsnow said:

GFS 144 12Z V 6Z

image.thumb.png.6fa29a4b7a81c7fcab219fed06a2bca7.png

image.thumb.png.cdbd2642a63d462d4024ba212dbfc311.png

High moving earlier again, let’s get this down to day 8 vice 10/12 🙌🏼🙌🏼

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Wantage, Oxon
  • Weather Preferences: Hot, cold!
  • Location: Wantage, Oxon
2 minutes ago, Battleground Snow said:

Ukmo 144 nice.

Taking the shorter route to deep cold like the icon I think. 168 will be fun

UN144-21 (9).gif

It won’t get there any faster!

It needs the WAA from the next ridge round west of Greenland, before our high can be sucked up, that is what is driving the timeline.  

Edit - looking at GEM, I’m talking nonsense, that does seem to be going Route 1!

Edited by Mike Poole
  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: oldham
  • Location: oldham
1 minute ago, Mike Poole said:

It won’t get there any faster!

It needs the WAA from the next ridge round west of Greenland, before our high can be sucked up, that is what is driving the timeline.  

This run has the high further north and west with low pressure dropping down the east side, the cold is going to get here a few days earlier than the 06z run.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Coventry
  • Location: Coventry
1 minute ago, Mike Poole said:

It won’t get there any faster!

It needs the WAA from the next ridge round west of Greenland, before our high can be sucked up, that is what is driving the timeline.  

Slightly disagree Mike, as I think our high will get sucked north faster due to the better Arctic high, the 06z gfs was an example of having left over heights too near us.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Kensington
  • Location: Kensington

Much better heights at 168 compared to the gfs  6z run.  Not quite the gem  but upgrades all round at this point 

Edited by weirpig
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: North East Cotswolds, 232m, 761feet ASL
  • Location: North East Cotswolds, 232m, 761feet ASL

Gem And GFS quite diff at 168, but both looking great 😀😀😀

IMG_2368.png

IMG_2369.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...