Jump to content
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?
IGNORED

Model Output Discussion - Spring Has Sprung


Message added by Paul,

Please read the model discussion guidelines  before posting into this thread.

Recommended Posts

Posted
  • Location: Kings Norton, West Midlands
  • Weather Preferences: Thunderstorms, Cold & Snowy
  • Location: Kings Norton, West Midlands

So it's pretty much 

ECM & UKMO v GFS, GEM, ARPEGE & ICON

...in terms of that initial front sliding through. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Peterborough
  • Weather Preferences: Snow and frost in the winter. Hot and sunny, thunderstorms in the summer.
  • Location: Peterborough

Late next week looks very delicate and very small differences can determine whether the low deepens towards the UK or runs through the channel as a shallow feature. The UKMO keeps the low separated from the main troughing which allows a much more southerly track, the GFS on the 06z not only connects the low but the cold pooling from Scandinavia connects to the PV moving towards Greenland at the time which seems to slow the low even further and deepen in situ as there is a gap to pull WAA ahead of the low over the UK, hence the snow to rain event.

I wouldn’t place my money on either option yet to be honest.

GFS

image.thumb.png.ef45ff47fcdfa12723a261ea5fc502b0.png

Hard to spot but you can see the embedded troughing within that low extending out of Greenland.

UKMO

image.thumb.gif.7e02553ced20832388ad9609bc65926e.gif
 

Much less pronounced and a more elongated and complex system. You could argue that the GFS is potentially over simplifying the set up into that one low when the reality could be a series of small systems that will gradually break eastwards.

 

Edited by Captain Shortwave
  • Like 3
  • Insightful 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Leicestershire (hinckley)
  • Location: Leicestershire (hinckley)

Gfs remaining consistent with snow mainly reserved for high ground across England and Wales. Snow for many in Scotland. Past history usually favours GFS in these type of scenarios at this range. Hopefully it's got this one wrong 🤞❄️

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Coventry
  • Location: Coventry

 sheikhy

Met office gone very early on a warning, sounds like they expect something quite disruptive.

Gfs does like to blow up lows in the Atlantic, it's probably it's biggest weakness.

Arpege out in 15 mins.....

Edited by Battleground Snow
  • Like 7
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Eastbourne and Larnaca,Cyprus .
  • Location: Eastbourne and Larnaca,Cyprus .

The GFS delivers the worst possible solution from the set up.

It blows the cold air away from the UK and from most of mainland Europe.

Dreadful stuff . If this verifies against the Euros at just day 4 meaning they’re both wrong then I think it’s time to call time on this winter .

Edited by nick sussex
  • Like 8
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: North east Hampshire
  • Location: North east Hampshire

GFS - the winter killer run. Just wasting everyone’s time if that synoptic sets up. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Leicestershire (hinckley)
  • Location: Leicestershire (hinckley)

 Spah1 Given GFS has historically called marginal situations correctly more so than the other main models I would say it's not waffle. I've followed these charts for over 20 years and this sort of setup favours the GFS solution. Of course your own locality may sway your judgement on that particularly if your further North but for Leicestershire when the gfs has predicted rain or sleet with other models suggesting snow then I've found it's nearly always been rain we end up with. 😂

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Maldon, Essex
  • Location: Maldon, Essex

 nick sussex I called time on this winter several weeks ago. Despite promising synoptics and background signals, something always goes wrong.

GFS aside, there are more ways of snow not happening at the end of the week than vice-versa.

If we do get anything wintry, see it as a huge bonus.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Reigate Hill
  • Weather Preferences: Anything
  • Location: Reigate Hill

 Battleground Snow  All models have agreed on some snow on Thursday as the front moves north, even the GFS! Which shows this:

image.thumb.png.34421e584495b44b3f8abd0d67b28b0f.png

So, it's not a surprise a warning has been issued. They did add "uncertainty", "turning to rain", and the "boundary", all things that we have been mulling over. I hope we get the best-case scenario.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Eastbourne and Larnaca,Cyprus .
  • Location: Eastbourne and Larnaca,Cyprus .

The issue with the GFS is that it’s shown absolutely no sign of any backtrack . Indeed it’s even worse which makes a possible middle ground solution underwhelming.

We really needed it to start moving . 

It really is last chance saloon time this evening .

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Nr Chelmsford, Essex
  • Weather Preferences: Hurricanes, Thunderstorms and blizzards please!
  • Location: Nr Chelmsford, Essex

GFS, UKMO, ECM, GEM at 138/144

image.thumb.png.143c1a498af6c0646c4b031127e10871.png image.thumb.png.33f9243c35e54ac969d655af99385c4d.png image.thumb.png.f14a48cc9092cb627ae953e242b9a591.png image.thumb.png.6a5232ac199bed199b19e90d585f7953.png

It's really a 1 in a 100 shot that the GFS has it right and the others wrong at this range (probably 1 in a 1000).  As @nick sussex says above, if it is correct I think we should in future bin all output beyond 72 hours! 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Longton, Stoke-on-Trent.
  • Location: Longton, Stoke-on-Trent.

GFS is always the worst performing model in this situations. Doesn't mean it's definitely wrong this time but it doesn't give one much confidence in it's output.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Home: Chingford, London (NE). Work: London (C)
  • Weather Preferences: Winter: cold and snowy. Summer: hot and sunny
  • Location: Home: Chingford, London (NE). Work: London (C)

 AltonMatthew Sort of agree, I have never been able to get myself excited for a snow to rain event. It may be nice while it lasts but if it's washed away in a matter of hours I tend to think what's the point. 

The main interest currently lies beyond that. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Clayton-le-Woods, Chorley, Lancs
  • Weather Preferences: Snow
  • Location: Clayton-le-Woods, Chorley, Lancs

The GFS runs at lower resolution. Exeter have just put out a warning based on their short range models not the GFS. So the MO are wrong 3 days out and the GFS is right??

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Arendal, Norway
  • Weather Preferences: Snow, snow and more snow!
  • Location: Arendal, Norway

Not THAT different from GEM though at 180 hours..

GFSOPEU06_180_1.pngGEMOPEU00_186_1.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...