Jump to content
Thunder?
Local
Radar
Hot?
IGNORED

Model Output Discussion - Into Winter


Message added by Paul,

This thread is for model related chat and discussion. Please head over to the Winter chat thread if your post isn't about the models. If you'd like some localised weather chat, make sure you've joined your regional group

Please use the insightful reaction on posts you think should be copied to the model highlights thread.

As ever, please keep to the community guidelines, the guiding principles of which are:
Be kind -- Stay on topic -- Share your knowledge -- Be polite -- Be honest -- Be tolerant -- Be family-friendly
 

Recommended Posts

Posted
  • Location: Wellseborne, Warwickshire
  • Weather Preferences: Southerly tracking low pressure in winter. Hot and thundery in the summer
  • Location: Wellseborne, Warwickshire
3 hours ago, Kasim Awan said:

Uppers don't matter much in a setup driven by evaporative cooling events and low heights.

 

A stiff westerly would be too much for that no? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, ITSY said:

I’ve got to say I’m a bit bemused by this talk of -7/-6 being necessary upper air temps for southerners. I’ve had inches of snow in Greater London and indeed Cambridge with -2/-3 uppers before. When you throw in late December sun, relatively low dew points and extremely low thickness values, temps of -3/-4 could readily suffice for surprise snowfalls in heavier bouts of precipitation. The reverse is also true of course and I’ve had rain in -4 uppers because the other factors have been out.

-4 (certainly not -7) is the general line we should look for as a max upper air temp but it’s quite possible, in given circs with the right other factors,  for snow to fall at higher temperatures than these even in southern areas without altitude. 

0.5C is the general max with frontal snow and evap cooling events.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Wildwood, Stafford 104m asl
  • Weather Preferences: obviously snow!
  • Location: Wildwood, Stafford 104m asl
8 minutes ago, Kasim Awan said:

0.5C is the general max with frontal snow and evap cooling events.

Higher in March to May

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Longton, Stoke-on-Trent.
  • Location: Longton, Stoke-on-Trent.
26 minutes ago, ITSY said:

I’ve got to say I’m a bit bemused by this talk of -7/-6 being necessary upper air temps for southerners. I’ve had inches of snow in Greater London and indeed Cambridge with -2/-3 uppers before. When you throw in late December sun, relatively low dew points and extremely low thickness values, temps of -3/-4 could readily suffice for surprise snowfalls in heavier bouts of precipitation. The reverse is also true of course and I’ve had rain in -4 uppers because the other factors have been out.

-4 (certainly not -7) is the general line we should look for as a max upper air temp but it’s quite possible, in given circs with the right other factors,  for snow to fall at higher temperatures than these even in southern areas without altitude. 

Yes it’s quite tiresome hearing how snow will be over mountains when I’ve seen snow from such setups countless times at very modest elevation.

  • Like 7
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Crewe, Cheshire
  • Weather Preferences: Snow, storms and other extremes
  • Location: Crewe, Cheshire

I’ve had 2 inches of snow fall here in December on a strongish NW’ly with uppers barely scraping -5. That’s at 55m elevation. 2011 I think.

Edited by Cheshire Freeze
  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Windermere 120m asl
  • Location: Windermere 120m asl

Models surprisingly in sync today, the theme continues to be high pressure to the south eventually sent west due to a movement of the PV east, but no signal for the high to build north. After a very mild period ahead, temps in the lead up to christmas back to average or a bit below further north.

I would not be surprised to see sudden short term developments in the run up to christmas, with runners and secondary low developments on the west flank of the trough. The unknown is how far south the trough will dig, further south and this would put a longer brake on the atlantic ridge toppling in and a return to milder westerlies and allow for a colder arctic maritime feed, not so far a dig and a shorter lived polar maritime blast.

A few days ago I thought we might see a Dec 01 redux, currently looking more a Dec 04 redux, but perhaps timings a bit earlier, in 04 we had a white christmas, this is not a prediction for a white christmas I add. In 2004 the atlantic ridge crashed in on the 27th. 

Once again the 13th year in a row with no substantive sustained cold in the immediate lead up to christmas, last year it fell apart on the 18th...  but there is some cold and wintry interest, in many recent years this has not been the case.  

 

Edited by damianslaw
  • Like 8
  • Insightful 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: North East Cotswolds, 232m, 761feet ASL
  • Location: North East Cotswolds, 232m, 761feet ASL

T132, compared to the 12z the PV has more of a NW/SE tilt to it, and more Height further north in Canada. To me that’s an upgrade, poss bringing the cold air in faster than the last run - slightly more potent.

we shall see in 10 mins 🤞

IMG_1778.png

IMG_1779.png

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Lancing, South coast
  • Weather Preferences: Sun, Snow and Storms
  • Location: Lancing, South coast
4 minutes ago, Ali1977 said:

T132, compared to the 12z the PV has more of a NW/SE tilt to it, and more Height further north in Canada. To me that’s an upgrade, poss bringing the cold air in faster than the last run - slightly more potent.

we shall see in 10 mins 🤞

IMG_1778.png

IMG_1779.png

Depends where the PV drops, the slower evolution on the 12z is what dropped the PV closer to us, would be weaker uppers if it heads further East.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: London
  • Location: London

Wish I could share the enthusiasm here but unless you’re on high ground up north this is a total non event for most. Cold rain for most.

Uppers of -4 approx nowhere near enough for snow on low ground irrespective of thickness. There’s also zero high latitude blocking in place so any temporary chilly conditions will be swept away with Atlantic fronts v quickly.

Edited by weathercold
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: North East Cotswolds, 232m, 761feet ASL
  • Location: North East Cotswolds, 232m, 761feet ASL
1 minute ago, Kasim Awan said:

Gfs too far east for me - joining the GEM.

Hopefully it’s just winding up around Labrador ready to drop a snow storm from the NW on Xmas Eve ⛄🤞

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Bournemouth
  • Weather Preferences: Dry mild or snow winter. Hot and humid summer.
  • Location: Bournemouth
Just now, TSNWK said:

Huge difference at day 7 looks better synoptic wise.. but will it drop south now.

image.thumb.png.375d6f92d9bef518521495f243c5932e.pngimage.thumb.png.ecc6cf2bce8c7541fda4cf54e43e1877.png

Hang on, we are having a detailed debate, again, on what we need for snow. Stop showing models in the model output discussion.😜🤣

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: North East Cotswolds, 232m, 761feet ASL
  • Location: North East Cotswolds, 232m, 761feet ASL

Different flow, but if we get the hammer from the NW on this run around Xmas there is a huge amount of extremely cold air ready to come with it compared to the 12z 

IMG_1780.png

IMG_1781.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Banbury
  • Weather Preferences: Deep Deep Snow causing chaos
  • Location: Banbury
Just now, Kasim Awan said:

This is a close run, not sure I like it.

But it was good a minute ago 😄

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...